The ENTITLED THE REPRESENTATION OF JUDGING OPENING PROCESS impeachment BRAZIL'S CHAMBER OF DEPUTIES ON 17 April 2016

The ENTITLED THE REPRESENTATION OF JUDGING OPENING PROCESS impeachment BRAZIL'S CHAMBER OF DEPUTIES ON 17 April 2016

The title is great, as well as the need to talk about it, that was not seen, despite the pro-government speeches and opponents to the NY Times article developed understand how illegitimate the judges today.

As sad as this fact was the news of the EI wants to attack Brazil, and calls Country Shit, that despite giants when confronted these outrages citizenship, is how we feel, but follows a warning to EI only we Brazilians we can entitle the country to shit, and, as we do, not because they love him, it is because we are so upset as the misrule and absence of light for those who manage the frame sometimes overshadows reality most of which are the people from whom you EI can only be jealous, no discussion of a religious nature, because we are, even in disgrace believers, absolutely and unequivocally, that we will improve without drop bombs, shame on you, you only live if it is to disgrace the lives of innocent to justify atrocities and debate in inappropriate political forum.

For the perspective of true policy found legitimacy not found by the NY Times for trial today, and I demonstrate the writing mistakes, even to argue that this circle, there are aspects of the media when addressing can not, under sorry for being not true, which are exempt, which was not the case, and I demonstrate.

Considering the Brazilian electoral system applications by parties and plates to hold the positions of public administration must take into account first the sheet decay factor to reach the reality of each party, in addition to the ripple effect factor to arrive the end result, which better care for valuing legitimate as is the government and the legislature.

This occupation, the Central Government, elected in Chapara by grouping several parties that the base fought with its members and supporters to convince voters to vote for their candidates.

The candidates enjoy the greatness they have the own contingent of voters in his favor, as has the respective parties. So its electoral asset if pre-existing can assess the chart formation for composition of parallel representation framework; in this case, the time, and absence of previous parameter spectrum same magnitude the example does not have the enabling effect of transforming the environment in such palatable.

That is, Dilma PT and Temer Pemedebista have votes, both without the parties have votes, but how much has the votes previously with margin expressionless errors do not have statistical security for trusted previous example that can mathematically make the equation that I want to demonstrate.

The parties of the turn, and the ripple effect resulting from previous times the elections can be measured so as to balance the equation and demonstrate the legitimacy of the representation of the opening trial of the impeachment process today.

As it is plate division, and how much percentage of each group (party and plate ripple effect at the end time of the election due to the plate without the party) contributed to the outcome of the election, so that the result did feel .

That is, before the plaque rupture, can not say that what remains in the original sheet would win election by voting contingent that traditionally occupy the electoral scene.

For this decomposition the PT government split, does not enjoy more in isolation, even with allies, the majority of population of legitimacy to remain in government.

Just for that, add the votes of the governing parties even in relation to the opposition, to take into account that the original picture was corrupted and the original representation is not more in most situations.

Beside this fact, it follows the analysis of the representation of the judges of the opening of impeachment for the day; elected by region, with its own contingent of voters in personal name of the judges, the winners board and now belonging to the college of judges has new profile 100% for the purpose of sampling and analysis of the equation.

Neglecting the plates, which contribute to the elect, because they do not judge, it takes into account that the elect, numbering 513, are judges representing a particular electoral quota.

Elected to defend regional flags and discussion of legislative and national character control in today take the exceptional role of being judgmental of political character.

In this scenario, when you judge, judge on behalf of their elected and the election framework is the trial frame, that is, if we take into account how much of voters represents the losers winners will have the actual percentage of trial mirrors the actual representation of today's judgment.

The impeachment, the reverse of that said the NY Times, takes into account the vote of judgment, that even in the US when they vote in this situation, they vote not proper for you, but above all on behalf of the represented, which his personal vote was presumably unit when the election, so in number and much smaller percentage than the picture that elected him;

Thus, the judgment of today, even if the US would not be questioned about the legitimacy of the voter, because it does not meet the previous condition of other functions of the representative of the people put in check by the American news.

It is diverse process that possibly existing contamination was reported, but not proved, it was vote-buying to stop the process.

The opposite scenario, opponents had no news even buying votes.

The question is whether judges who are corrupt according to the news, nothing to gain, but again have the opportunity to elect, today is the day that judges voters are at the same time, and, more than ever being tried and you know it by their constituents, then that will make today will have repercussions on the political future, and when this is in mind, there is no corrupting that is winning, because there will be recovery, and this history and all judges voters today, does not forgive traitors.

Finally, the votes counted today and added the votes that voted for as votes received in the elections that led him to take the picture, due to the fact the trial represent national reality overflowing regional issues as far as the vote for elected president, we will have the realistic framework of trial representation in reverse of the picture painted by the NY Times. After yes there elections, making this account Brazil and the world will know the legitimate as is the judgment, then I finish the text to 07 hours and 11 minutes to be fair to my reasoning as free as the real result will come later, when the weights of the votes of the previous polls were balanced on the votes of the judges voters today.

Brazil, April 17, 2016

Helio Barreto dos Santos Filho

E-mail: heliobsf@student.uc.pt;